The following material was written by the Rev. John Shearman (jlss@sympatico.ca) of the United Church of Canada. John has structured his offerings so that the first portion can be used as a bulletin insert, while the second portion provides a more in depth 'introduction to the scripture'
INTRODUCTION TO THE SCRIPTURE
Ordinary 14 - Proper 9 - Year A
[NOTE: Throughout the Season after Pentecost the RCL
provides a set of alternate lessons which some
denominations prefer. A summary of these readings is
also included below.]
GENESIS 24:34-38, 42-49, 58-67 Rather than permit his son to marry a
Canaanite, Abraham gave his servant a commission to find a wife for Isaac
from among the tribal community from which Abraham himself had migrated
from Haran to Canaan. A religious theme adds meaning to this romantic
story. It develops the promise to Abraham that he would father a great
nation through his son Isaac. Behind the details of the tribal legend
lies Israel’s faith in God’s over-ruling providence throughout its
history.
PSALM 45:10-17 This conclusion to one of the so-called
“royal psalms” celebrates a king’s marriage to a foreign princess. A few
verses are addressed to the princess (vss. 10-12), but the whole psalm
effuses about the virtues, wealth and divine authority of Israel’s
monarch.
SONG OF SOLOMON 2:8-13 [Alternate] This lyrical love song,
like the whole collection in this book, may have originated as a song
sung at a marriage ceremony in ancient Israel.
ZECHARIAH 9:9-12 [Alternate] Christians readily
recognize this passage as the model for Jesus’ triumphal entry into
Jerusalem. Matthew actually quoted part of it in his record of that
event. Undoubtedly, it originated as a hopeful prophetic oracle with
messianic implications based on Israel’s sacred covenant. However, it
should not be regarded as a prediction of the actual arrival of Jesus in
the Jerusalem prior to his crucifixion.
PSALM 145:8-14 [Alternate] This excerpt from a psalm
of praise for individual and congregational devotion celebrates the grace,
love and power of God to save all who put their trust in God.
ROMANS 7:15-25a Does anyone not feel the depth of moral
conflict Paul described in this passage? He didn’t put it in modern
psycho-babble such as we might use; but he made perfectly plain how
intense the conscious struggle of the will becomes when we face
temptation, or unconsciously when we just want our own way. He made
equally plain the only true resource for freedom from the guilt of our
failure to resist temptation- the grace of forgiveness through Jesus
Christ.
MATTHEW 11:16-19, 25-30 Jesus likely uttered these three
quotations attributed to him at quite different times. The first saying
not only describes a children’s imitative game of biblical times, it also
tells of the frustration of teaching without visible response. The prayer
in vss. 25-27 may not be Jesus’ words at all. They reflect an attitude
more common in later period when some regarded the Christian community as
more closely restricted than at first.
A MORE COMPLETE ANALYSIS:
GENESIS 24:34-38, 42-49, 58-67 Sadly, many details of this ancient love
story have been omitted from the RCL. Those wishing to preach on some
aspect of the story would benefit greatly from study and reflection on the
whole narrative (24:1-67). As it stands now in scripture, it is a
conflation of two traditions, the J and E documents with some by later
editorial redactions. The two versions share many common elements
nonetheless.
In these selections, we read of the successful mission by Abraham’s
servant to find a wife for Isaac. Rather than permit his son to marry a
Canaanite, Abraham had sent his servant with a marriage proposal to the
same tribal community in Haran from which Abraham himself had migrated to
Canaan. A religious theme adds meaning to this romantic story. It
develops the promise to Abraham that he would father a great nation
through his son Isaac. Behind the details of the tribal legend lies
Israel’s faith in God’s over-ruling providence throughout its history.
The custom of arranged marriage still exists in many tribal cultures of
the Middle East and Africa. Included in the arrangement were gifts from
the parent suitor to the intended bride’s family. (24:52-53) Such
practices do not fit well with the romantic customs of the modern West.
On the other hand, as late as the 1950s examples of the practice could
still be found in Canadian rural communities.
A noteworthy discrepancy in the two versions of the story exists in the
naming of Rachel’s father. Who exactly was he – Laban or Bethuel? (Cf.
22:20,23; 24:47,50; 29:5) Another discrepancy exists in the way the
family or Rebecca herself accepted the proposal of marriage. (Cf. 24:50-
51,58) The confusion probably came about in the oral transmission of the
story, including the various tribal genealogies referred to in different
traditions.
From the scriptural point of view, the whole narrative carries forward the
covenantal promise by Yahweh to Abraham that he would father a great
nation. This became the basic motif of the subsequent history of Israel
and the prophetic concept of Yahweh as Lord of history. This biblical
motif can be found in religious and theological circles frequently
expressed by modern Christian preaching. Herbert Butterfield, a noted
British historian and a committed Christian, also adopted it in his 1931
*The Whig Interpretation of History*. Writing before and after the World
Wars of 1914-18 and 1939-45, he critiqued earlier liberal historiography,
like that of Thomas Macaulay and other 19th century historians. He claimed
that they had overemphasized a course of progress away from savagery and
ignorance towards peace, prosperity, and science. Yet after the defeat of
Nazism, Butterfield still believed in a divinely providential view of
history he found in the Christian scriptures.
PSALM 45:10-17 The theme of marriage plays a prominent part in the two
readings related to the OT lesson above. This conclusion to one of the
so-called “royal psalms” celebrates a king’s marriage to a foreign
princess. A few verses are addressed to the princess (vss. 10-12).
Almost obsequious in its wording, the whole psalm effuses about the
virtues, wealth and divine authority of Israel’s monarch. Obviously its
original author was a court poet assigned to produce a poem of praise to
the king and his bride.
In the first part of the psalm not included in this reading, the poet
addresses the monarch himself. He rules victoriously over Israel’s
enemies (vss. 4-5). Vss. 5-9 point to his special role in Israelite
social and political structure as the representative of Yahweh. He has
been anointed by Yahweh and so both commands and enjoys the wealth of the
nation.
The conclusion to what is known as one of the so-called “royal psalms”
celebrates a king’s marriage to a foreign princess. Vss. 10-12 address
the princess whom the king is to wed. She is to leave her father’s house,
possibly in Tyre (vs. 12), to wed the king bedecked in royal splendour.
No longer will her own tribal ancestors have a significant role in her
life. Rather, her own many sons will bring her glory and so her name will
be celebrated by future generations of Israelites.
Speculations on the identity of the royal couple has produced many
suggestions, none of which can be validated. Some scholars fix their
proposals precariously on Ahab’s marriage to Jezebel, daughter of the king
of Tyre. Others date the psalm, which is of a secular rather than a
religious nature, from a time when the king’s messianic role had
prominence. A Christian era Targum on the psalm interpreted the king and
his bride as the Messiah and Israel.
SONG OF SOLOMON 2:8-13 [Alternate] The collection of songs we know as
The Song of Songs or Canticles have had many varied interpretations.
Attributed to Solomon, the title can only be seen as a superscription
linking the songs to Israel’s celebrated poet and lover. Little agreement
exists as to its origin, date, structure and unity. This lyrical love
song, like the whole collection, may have originated as a song sung at the
common marriage ceremonies of early Israel. It has mad similarities in
ancient Egyptian love lyrics. Much of its imagery and references to
nature, human sexuality and terms of endearment can also be found in other
ancient near Eastern cultures.
Is this collection of poems to be interpreted allegorically, dramatically,
literally or ritualistically? No one can be sure. All methods of
interpretation have had favour over the centuries. After the destruction
of the Second Temple in 70 CE, it did not find a welcome place in the
Jewish canon because of its subject matter. It only received final
acceptance because many Jewish rabbinical scholars regarded it as an
allegory of Yahweh’s love for Israel. St. Bernard of Clairvaux, (1090-
1153) founder of the Benedictine Order, preached 86 psalms on texts he
understood as depicting the love of Christ for the Christian Church. In
recent times, more open-minded liberal scholarship has returned it to its
appropriate place as a celebration of human love and sexuality.
This interpretation fits best in reading the excerpt in this reading.
Typically, it celebrates the ancient tradition of the reawakening of
nature and human sexuality in springtime.
ZECHARIAH 9:9-12 [Alternate] Christians readily recognize this passage
as the model for Jesus’ triumphal entry into Jerusalem in all four
Gospels. Matthew and John actually quoted part of it in their separate
records of that event. (Matthew 21:5; John 12:15) Undoubtedly, it
originated as a hopeful prophetic oracle with messianic implications based
on Israel’s sacred covenant with Yahweh. However, it should not be
regarded as a prediction of the actual arrival of Jesus in the Jerusalem
prior to his crucifixion.
The passage comes from what scholars designate as an anonymous appendix
mistakenly attached to the earlier chapters 1-8 of Zechariah. Modern
scholarship places the prophecies of Zechariah in the early Persian
period, soon after the return from the Babylonian exile (539 BCE).
General scholarly consensus places chapters 9-14 much later, but different
opinions have claimed precedence for an exact date. One of the stronger
claims dates it in the time of Alexander and his conquests in the late 4th
century. Vs. 13 of this 9th chapter refers distinctly to Greece in the
English versions.
The first part of chapter from which this reading has been separated
refers to many of Israel’s neighbouring city states which are under threat
of invasion or already captured from an overwhelming military power. This
brief passage and subsequent verses defends Jerusalem as having Yahweh’s
protection. Ultimately Yahweh will triumph as earlier prophets like Amos,
Isaiah and Ezekiel prophesied. The passage also has similarities to the
so-called “Enthronement” Psalms 43, 93, 96-99. The king, however, is the
messianic monarch anointed by Yahweh to whom Israel looked for deliverance
in such desperate times.
PSALM 145:8-14 [Alternate] This excerpt from a psalm of praise for
individual and congregational devotion celebrates the grace, love and
power of God to save all who put their trust in God. As only part of a
majesty hymn, it loses some of its power.
Although composite in nature and includes material drawn from other
psalms, it represents pure praise. Like a number of other psalms too, it
is in the form of an acrostic with each verse beginning with successive
letters of the Hebrew alphabet. (Pss. 9-10; 25; 34; 37; 111-112; 119).
That characteristic became most common in the late postexilic age, perhaps
even the 3rd or early 2d century BCE. However, an accident in
transcription may have dropped the nun verse between vss. 13 and 14.
The hymn opens with an exultant accolade citing the poet’s purpose to
adore the Yahweh as the ruler of the universe. He then declares that he
will meditate on the mighty acts of Yahweh which others will also proclaim
(vss. 4-7). Divine compassion heads the list (vss. 8-9).
The psalmist then summons others to bless the Lord (vss. 10-13). In a
final section, he celebrates Yahweh’s justice and kindness. He then
concludes his praise with a doxology and summons all to join him once
again.
ROMANS 7:15-25a Does anyone not feel the depth of moral conflict Paul
described in this passage? He didn’t put it in modern psycho-babble such
as we might use; but he did make perfectly plain how intense the conscious
struggle of the will becomes when we face temptation. Such conflict also
happens unconsciously when we just want our own way. He made equally
plain the only true resource for freedom from the guilt of our failure to
resist temptation - the grace of forgiveness through Jesus Christ.
A Bible study group of adults were having a lot of good fun discussing how
to apply their struggling faith to their day to day life in a upper middle
class community. Having worked through the meaning from them of Galatians
5:22-23, they turned to the Letter to the Colossians and then the Letter
to the Ephesians. Sin became very real to them. Grace and salvation, so
common in the Pauline letters, seemed less real. “We know what’s right,”
said one member of the group, “we just can’t do it as we feel we should.”
At that point the leader suggested turning to this paragraph in Romans.
It was an “Aha!” moment for every one, the leader included.
We need to demystify Paul’s struggle and put it in terms of our own lives.
Like the life-long struggle of the alcoholic, we are forever just one step
away from failure. We need to walk with Christ in us every day, every
moment. Only then can we live with serenity and hope.
MATTHEW 11:16-19, 25-30 Jesus likely uttered these three remembered
quotations attributed to him at quite different times. The first saying
not only describes a children’s imitative game of biblical times, it also
tells of the frustration of teaching without visible response. The prayer
in vss. 25-27 may not be Jesus’ words at all. They reflect an attitude
more common in later period when some regarded the Christian community as
more closely restricted than at first. They have some similarity to the
prayer in John 17.
The final call to find rest in Christ’s service contains echoes of the
final blessing in the apocryphal book Ecclesiasticus aka Sirach, (50:22-
26). Written originally in Hebrew written about 200 years BCE and
translated into Greek by Jesus ben Sirach’s grandson in 132 BCE. Not
included in the Hebrew canon, it is known through the Greek translation.
However, Hebrew fragments were found among the Qumran scrolls and in the
fortress of Masada which endured the Romans-Jewish War of 69-70 CE. In
desperation the fortress held out much longer and fell to the Romans in 73
CE only after all surviving Jews had committed suicide. It is entirely
possible that Jesus knew the work of Sirach with its aphorisms, moral
maxims, proverbs, psalms of praise, theological and homiletic reflections.
His own teaching had many of the same characteristics.
Sirach wrote: “And now bless the Lord of all things, the doer of great
deeds everywhere, who has exalted our days from the womb and acted toward
us in mercy. May he grant us cheerful hearts and bring us peace in our
time, in Israel for ages on ages. May his mercy be faithfully with us,
and may he redeem us in our time.”
To quote a 21st century Jewish journalist, Thomas Friedman, “A holy book,
whether to Bible or the Qur’an, is only holy to the extent that it shapes
human life and behaviour.”
A sermon preached in Matthew 11:28-30 actually changed lives on a small
rural community where two leaders of the congregation were at war over a
decision with which they disagreed. When the minister pronounced the
benediction and left the sanctuary, he wonder why the congregation did not
follow him to the door where he normally greeted them. Returning to the
sanctuary he found the two women embraced each other in tears while the
rest of the congregation stood around in amazement.
copyright - Comments by Rev. John Shearman and page by Richard J. Fairchild, 2006
please acknowledge the appropriate author if citing these resources.
|